« April 2007 | Main | June 2007 »

May 2007 Archives

May 3, 2007

We Are to the 59th Minute, So What?

David SuzukiAmong the many messages AIA Convention attendees got Thursday morning, May 3, in San Antonio was an illustration from biologist David Suzuki, host of Canada’s longstanding CBC program the Nature of Things, on how exponential growth works in the consumption of resources.

You start with a vial of nutrient and one microbe, Suzuki said. In his model, the microbe and its progeny will divide once every second. Exponentially, that is a doubling of the population per second: after two seconds, there are four microbes, in three seconds you have eight microbes, and so on. At 60 seconds, in Suzuki's example, all the food will be gone and the vile will be filled with microbes. Working backward, that means that at 59 seconds, the vile was half full of microbes and half full of food, which doesn’t sound too dire. And at 57 seconds, with only a few seconds left till the end, the vile is only 1/8 full of microbes, with what might seem like (at least to the microbes) a plentiful 7/8 of a vile of food.

Human consumption of Earth’s resources is not moving at that speed in real time, of course, but it is moving exponentially, which, Suzuki exclaimed, is ultimately a suicidal pace. And, given homo sapiens’ ability to consume resources so voraciously, especially over the last century (Earth’s population has tripled even since 1936, from 2 billion people to 6 billion), we must take control of our wasteful habits now.

To use his microbial analogy, Suzuki says, the human race is at the 59th minute. The mission of his foundation has a positive message, though: Sustainability Within a Generation. And he explains on his Web site what that means. Take a few minutes to look through it and tell us:

What do you think?

May 11, 2007

A Lightning Rod for Emissions Control

In public debate it is almost invariable that issues of the common good come down to devisive social, political, and/or faith-based stance. The issue of the link between carbon emissions and global warming is no different.

In the last few months, as we have been publicizing five theme speakers for the 2007 AIA National Convention and Exposition (covered extensively in the 5/14-20/07 edition of AIArchitect), we have noticed an interesting thing. One speaker in particular, former Vice President Al Gore, has been a lightning rod of extremes. Some people love the man, some despise him, and few teeter in between.

Unfortunately, that means that the arguments based on reasoned debate are too often lost against the background noise of name calling and the dogma of "I'm right, and you're wrong ... [hands over ears] Lah, lah, lah, lah, I can't hear you."

This week we will take the risk of not saying much of anything here and ask you to take the leap of courage to hit the "Comments" button below and engage in a bit of discussion in the "post a comment" section that pops up (it can be anonymous). Is there a crisis of global proportion regarding carbon emissions? Is it human-caused? If so, are architects the best-positioned professionals to made a difference? And, if not, is it a worthwhile goal or not to curb pollution and oil/coal-based energy production?

What do you think?

May 17, 2007

Shouldn’t the Architect of the Capitol Be an Architect?

by Marshall E. Purnell, FAIA
AIA First Vice President
 

Marshall E. Purnell, FAIAIn the coming decade, the person Congress recommends and President Bush selects to be Architect of the Capitol for the next 10-year appointment will be managing facilities encompassing nearly 15 million square feet, including major renovations to historic buildings, while assuring, of course, that congressional activities are accommodated fully.

The position of the AIA in informing those key members of Congress who sit on the Architect of the Capitol Commission is that:

By education, training, and professional experience, the pool of American architects is the logical source for candidates for this job. The public interest requires that the design of all structures primarily for human habitation or use be done by a professional architect.

The AIA position, further, is that all viable candidates for the Architect of the Capitol position possess a wide range of knowledge and proven skills  in areas such as:

  • Large-facility management involving multidisciplinary teams overseeing complex schedules and tight budgets
  • Diplomacy in resolving issues presented by public officials
  • Consummate understanding of design
  • Expertise in the latest building security and safety technologies
  • Knowledge of the science of historic preservation.

Although professionals in other fields have mastery of various subsets of this range of skills, only professional architects—as required for licensure—possess all of them.

To drive home the importance of these points to the Architect of the Capitol Commission as it forms a shortlist this month of three nominations for the president's selection, we have contacted AIA members who are the commission members' constituents and asked them to petition those representatives and senators. Visit this page to see that petition.

What do you think?

May 24, 2007

From Prosperity Comes Social Responsibility

Leslie RobertsonIn a recent interview with AIArchitect, Leslie Robertson, one of the world's leading building engineers, talked of the social issues involved with the current multi-national race to construct the tallest building on the planet. He began by explaining some differences in mindset of various clients overseas. In Hong Kong, developers take to the skies as a land-squeeze necessity. Whereas, in Dubai, builders are intent on making a world-attention-grabbing statement of the UAE's arrival on center stage.

Ultimately, of course, the developer is looking for return on investment, and Robertson and the teams with which he works to deliver eye-popping architectural landmarks are good enough at delivering that return that Leslie Robertson and Associates can be somewhat selective in the work it takes on. For instance, “we’re the kind of company that does not do military work. Period,” he says.

Moreover, Robertson believes that there is a social end-point for the rush to build the tallest, most opulent building in the world. When enough people “are looking up at them, realizing they can’t afford that,” he opines, “I don’t know that society is going to go along with that forever.”

“Ultimately, the developer should make a profit,” yet, Robertson says, “they have an obligation to the city where they are building. They should raise the quality of living and working spaces, not lower it … There is so much work out there that you have to select the kind of work you’re comfortable with and that you want to do.”

What do you think?

May 31, 2007

Designers Are Not Relief Workers

Kansas tornado damageCameron Sinclair, the British-born and educated, California-based architect and cofounder of Architecture for Humanity addressed Canadian architects in mid-May about the role of architects in disaster response. There are organizations that excel in relief work, he said. Architects, though, help most if they organize to help survivors find lasting solutions over time.

Innovative, sustainable, and collaborative design makes a difference, starting with providing shelter and—through competitions, workshops, educational forums, and strategic partnerships—moving to develop the social and physical infrastructures that remake communities. Those are lessons he learned in bringing earthquake-resistant design concepts to Iran and Turkey, flood-control strategies to Southeast Asia, school buildings to India, and community planning efforts to the post-Katrina Gulf region.

Architects Without Borders founder Craig Williams offers his own take on how to approach community redevelopment after a disaster in this week’s Doer’s Profile. As first responders, he says, architects would be limited to a few individuals assessing needs to inform preliminary planning.

When the devastating catastrophe struck Greensburg, Kan., this past month, AIA members brought just such a holistic vision as they stepped up to help—and the way they determined they could help most is by endeavoring to bring the town back as a model of resource-efficient design.

Maybe architects aren’t the best first responders to bring disaster relief, but they are the ones communities are turning to for re-life.

What do you think?

About May 2007

This page contains all entries posted to AIArchitect in May 2007. They are listed from oldest to newest.

April 2007 is the previous archive.

June 2007 is the next archive.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.34