Does Size Really Matter?
Every president from George Washington to Barack Obama has extolled the virtues of small businesses (at least we assume Washington did, in between not telling lies and fathering the country). And there’s good reason: studies show that small businesses create the vast majority of new jobs in this country. That is why the federal government, particularly through the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), offers scores of programs, incentives and financing options to help small companies form and grow. That includes small architecture firms.
The question is, though, what constitutes a small business, especially a small architecture firm?
According to the SBA, in most non-manufacturing industries a small business is one that has no more than $7 million in annual average receipts. Landscape architect and interior design businesses are defined as small if they are at or below that $7 million threshold. However, the SBA defines a small architectural business as having no more than $4.5 million in average annual receipts. The same goes for engineering businesses. The SBA explains how it derives at these figures, based on a number of factors.
Is that fair? Being a small business opens a world of loans and assistance and even government contracting opportunities. Are some small-but-not-small-enough-by-SBA-standards architecture firms (i.e., those that are between $4.5 million and $7 million) at a competitive disadvantage? Or are the numbers right? Let us know what you think.