National Associates Committee

May 18, 2009

What do you want to be called in 2010?

We want to know what you think “non-licensed” architects should be called. What is in the name or titling for you? What does it get you, where does it get you or how does it make you feel? Those of us on the licensure track are working really hard to earn the title of “architect” and those of us who are architects treasure the right to the title. So, what can we non-licensed individuals call ourselves without being confused with architectural students?

Posted by Zach Porter on May 18, 2009 8:25 AM | | Comments (56)

February 2, 2009

New Look!

The new AIA Web site is live!  
Take some time to navigate the new site then, when you have time, post your feedback. What do you like? What needs work? Any and all constructive feedback is welcome.

Posted by Zach Porter on February 2, 2009 11:55 AM | | Comments (1)

January 23, 2009

Tested out the new e-EVR?

Candidates and Supervisors: Use the ‘e-EVR’ system and let us know what you think.  If you encounter any errors or problems with the e-EVR online reporting system, report them immediately to NCARB at the link ‘Contact NCARB Staff’ found on the e-EVR.  For more information, http://www.aia.org/aiarchitect/thisweek09/0123/0123rc_face.cfm

Posted by Jaclyn Toole on January 23, 2009 9:46 AM | | Comments (3)

December 3, 2008

What Do You Think about the Economic Downturn

The economic downturn not only sends shivers as we hear about friends’ firms laying off employees, but also impacts how those of us who have so-far remained unscathed spend our daily lives.  Many of the decisions we make are freighted with concerns about our friends, our families, and ourselves as the economy slows. 
What steps have you or your firm taken to prepare for the tough times ahead?  Do you feel ready for the slowdown?  Share your thoughts with other associates. 

Posted by Zach Porter on December 3, 2008 10:34 AM | | Comments (3)

November 6, 2008

Generation Y Redefines Diversity

Simple introduction to the profession will not be sufficient; future generations will also need to express their relevance to society at large. Perceptions of diversity and inclusion will gradually evolve as we shift to a more globally connected, culturally diverse, and socially driven profession. To see an impact, we ultimately must reach a point where we employ inclusive practices instinctively.  Tell us what you think.  To read the entire article, click here http://www.aia.org/aiarchitect/thisweek08/1107/1107rc_face.cfm

 


Posted by Jaclyn Toole on November 6, 2008 1:57 PM | | Comments (0)

October 31, 2008

Transitions from ARE 3.1 to ARE 4.0

The Architect Registration Examination (ARE) was upgraded to a new format and structure when NCARB launched ARE 4.0 this past July.  The latest version of the exam combines the graphic vignettes and multiple-choice content, reducing the overall number of divisions from nine to seven.   Fill us in on your experience - What do you think about the change from ARE 3.1 to ARE 4.0? What has your method of study been for ARE 3.1/4.0?  Did the transition affect you in any way?  Share your tips, tricks, successes and frustrations.

Posted by Zach Porter on October 31, 2008 9:11 AM | | Comments (10)

September 11, 2008

What’s in a name? The question is: What’s not in the name that should be?

How many times have you seen the term “Intern Architect” used by employers, employees, AIA components, or NCARB? Did you know that this term is not legally defined or allowed in almost half of the states? Many articles have been written on the subject suggesting that it is time to institute an industry-wide title change.  What are your thoughts a title change? What title would you recommend?

Reference:  http://www.aia.org/aiarchitect/thisweek08/0912/0912rc_face.cfm

Posted by Jaclyn Toole on September 11, 2008 12:35 PM | | Comments (50)

September 2, 2008

Blurring Boundaries: Share Your Work-Life Balance Tips and Tricks

Last winter AssociateNews conducted a reader employment survey. More than three-quarters of respondents indicated that it was either very important or important that a typical workweek remain around 40 hours and that a comp time policy be instituted so that when we do have a big push, the extra hours can be utilized as time-off later.  Flex time, or the ability to manipulate your own schedule based on personal or project needs, was even more appealing to associates – 82% of respondents indicated that flex time was either very important or important.  Additionally, The New York Times article “Still Searching for Equilibrium in the Work-Life Balancing Act” by Kelly Pate Dwyer references a study by the Society for Human Resource Management stating that “[Balance] is the No. 1 factor in job satisfaction for workers age 35 and younger.” This is especially interesting for associates, who are typically younger than our AIA counterparts.

Have you found a way to balance your work life and home life?  What struggles or triumphs have you experienced since entering the workforce?  Share your tips, tricks, successes and difficulties.

Posted by Zach Porter on September 2, 2008 9:23 AM | | Comments (3)

July 29, 2008

Are We "Walking The Walk" in the Right Direction?

By Mark Schwamel, Assoc. AIA

As our industry continues moving towards a ‘greener’ tomorrow, the National Associates Committee (NAC) requests your personal opinions about your recent experiences at the American Institute of Architects national convention in Boston and whether or not you feel we are on the right path to a sustainable future.
Read more of Are We "Walking The Walk" in the Right Direction? in Forward

Describe how sustainable your overall convention experience was?

As we all work towards reaching the 2030 Challenge regarding carbon-neutrality, should we be doing more or is this already a big enough challenge for our profession? Should the AIA and architects in general be supporting or initiating other programs regarding sustainability and doing even more?

Posted by Zach Porter on July 29, 2008 1:59 PM | | Comments (0)

June 19, 2008

Resolution 2008-07 aka "6 Month Rule"

NCARB will vote on Resolution 2008-07, commonly known as the "6 Month Rule" on June 28, 2008.  If passed, this rule will require mandatory reporting of IDP Training Units every 6 months.  Under this new rule, training that is not reported within that time period, will begin to expire similar to the “Rolling Clock”.   Tell us what you think, should training experience become invalid?

Posted by Discussion Leader on June 19, 2008 10:53 AM | | Comments (3)