I’m a big proponent of architects knowing how buildings get put together. I spent an extra few years in school to earn a postbaccalaureate degree in building construction because I think architects also need more “credibility” when working with the guys in the field who are actually building our design. I was reviewing some older posts from the What’s on Your Mind blog, and came across one where the architect “got a talkin’ to” from the tile setter because the beautiful tile design used tiles of different thicknesses.
Alas, I already knew tile thickness is a bigger issue than only the aesthetics. You see, my kids love taking on building experiments with me. We recently tiled the top of an old wicker table to make a new checkerboard for the living room. We had some 2 x 2 gloss black tiles left over from a previous hearth project (I’m too cheap to buy everything new for an “experiment”). We bought two sheets of tumbled stone mosaics and determined that if it was cut into 2 x 2 sizes, the pattern works great. Contrasting large with small sizes, different surfaces, we know it would be wonderful—except for the tile thickness and the substrate. It was a wicker table and I thought it would “act” like lath. It didn’t; it got really wet from the mortar and the grout and buckled. On the tile thickness, when we realized it, we buttered the back of the thinner tiles with a little more mortar so it could be squished down. It worked, sort of, until the wicker wanted to buckle. So after it settled a little bit, and we got all the tiles in place, we put a few boards over it and weighted it with books. When the directions said it was okay to grout, we did but the buckling problem came back and cracked the grout. We sprayed it and weighted it again and left the “experiment” to bake for a few days. After a week it “healed” itself. We sealed the tile and are using the table for chess/checkers, etc.
My kids (13, 10, and 7 years old) really like experimenting. It gives us additional ways to stay close as a family; it lets them see how else to “learn”; and hopefully teaches them that even when you’re grown up you still always need to learn. We want to rebuild our deck next.
—Lisa Stacholy, AIA
Comments (2)
I had a client who owned shopping centers and built all kinds of things-out of necessity at first-- to work on his shopping centers. He told me he learned the trades by getting hired on for short jobs. He paid his tuition by working cheap, but he did learn.
I, too, think architects ought to build. I've built houses while practicing architecture. That is, I designed and I contracted to trades, except one, that was supposed to be a cabin; my wife and I did all but the most dangerous work ('fraid of hts!), or that required skills we could not learn fast enough. On Mothers Day she was tying steel for a concrete floor; what a trooper, and she will never let me forget it. The flower basket was hanging over the work.
Well I did get a helping hand now and then. Building is a good hobby. Generally, you get your investment back as well as any, it is a good place to try new things, you get to buy lots of tools. And you will think forever in terms of constructablility when dreaming up your details for others to build.
Posted by Morry Stafford | September 17, 2008 8:32 PM
Posted on September 17, 2008 20:32
Learning by doing. Can't wait for the deck story!
Posted by Laura Montllor,AIA | August 31, 2008 5:06 PM
Posted on August 31, 2008 17:06